The Best In Ear Monitors for Musicians - Wireless
Author & Contributors
Raphael Pulgar
I've been an audio engineer for 20 years specializing in rock and metal recordings, and also I play guitar and produce original music for my band and other content creators.
Single Receivers
Xvive U4
Cons
- Built in battery is not user serviceable
Pros
- Small and light
- Built in rechargeable batteries
- Good battery life - will last for an entire gig without recharging
Xvive provides compact and affordable in-ear monitoring that does not come with an actual earpiece, so you can use your preferred headphones or earphones.
It is designed to be easy to use, operating on the 2.4Ghz frequency, with a range of over 90 feet with clear line of sight, making it more than enough for most small venues.
This system runs a rechargeable battery that can last up to 5 hours.
The thing that sets the Xvive system apart from the others is the transmitter's extremely small size. At first this might not seem like much of a big deal, but when you're jumping around on stage it feels like it's more secure and there's less size to get in the way of your guitar (I'm also a guitarist).
Having rechargeable batteries built in is also a plus for me because constantly having to buy disposable batteries really starts to add up if you play a lot of gigs. The only complaint I have is that the batteries aren't user serviceable, and as you probably know from your mobile phone, eventually the battery life will degrade and in a couple of years you will need to get it replaced.
Other than that, the XVive U4 is a good affordable investment for those who want to test the waters of in-ear monitoring.
Features
- Transmitter: U4T
- Receiver: U4R
- Earphones: None
- Frequency Range: 2.4 GHz
- Transmitter Input: 1 x XLR
- Transmitter Output: None
- Receiver Output: 1 x 1/8"
- Receiver Power: Rechargeable Lithium-ion
| Website | Source | *Rating Value |
| Guitar Interactive | Jonathan Graham | 95/100 |
| YouTube | Aaron Short Music | 96/100 |
Shure PSM 300 (P3TR112GR)
Cons
- Transmitter batteries only last reliably for a bit over 2 hours
Pros
- One touch frequency scan makes set up easy
The P3TR112GR version of the PSM 300 set offers a different bodypack than its upmarket twin, the P3TRA215CL.
This doesn't mean that sound quality and signal fidelity is sacrificed with the lower price.
The set still features one touch frequency scan and IR sync. This is a time saving feature and if you're band is using multiple units, then setting them to separate frequencies is a breeze.
It uses 2 AA batteries in the transmitter which start to run down after a couple of hours, so if you play multiple sets each gig then you'll want to have spare batteries ready to go. And if you play a lot of gigs you'll save quite a bit of cash if you invest in rechargeable batteries.
If you're looking for a wireless IEM set from a reliable brand for just the right budget, the Shure PSM300 P3TR112GR is a great pick.
Features
- Transmitter: P3T
- Receiver: P3R
- Earphones: SE112
- Frequency Range: G20 (488MHz-512MHz), H20 (518MHz-541MHz), J13 (566MHz-590MHz) bands available
- Number of Frequencies: 15
- Transmitter Input: 2 x 1/4"
- Transmitter Output: 2 x 1/4" (loop out)
- Receiver Output: 1 x 1/8"
- Receiver Power: 2 x AA Batteries
- Earphone Freq Response: 25Hz-17kHz
- Earphone Cable Length: 50"
Shure PSM 300 (P3TRA215CL)
Cons
- Transmitter batteries only last reliably for a little over 2 hours
Pros
- Quick and easy to setup
- The bodypack has mixing controls
Shure built their reputation on the quality and reliability of their products, and this same principle is at work in the PSM 300.
This IEM system comes packed with features that make it easy to setup, including its one touch frequency scan and IR sync, which automatically finds and assigns a clean wireless channel for the system to use.
The bodypack also features mixing control so you can set or adjust your monitor mix and levels the way you want to in real time.
Battery drain is also an issue with this model so if you perform for more than 2 hours of performance time at a gig, you should have backup batteries ready.
If you're looking for a wireless IEM system with Shure's brand of reliability without going above one grand, then get the Shure PSM 300 (P3TRA215CL).
Features
- Transmitter: P3T
- Receiver: P3RA
- Earphones: 2 x IE 4
- Frequency Range: 488MHz-512MHz
- Number of Frequencies: 15
- Transmitter Input: 2 x TRS
- Transmitter Output: 2 x TRS
- Receiver Output: 1 x 1/8"
- Receiver Power: 2 x AA Batteries
- Earphone Freq Response: 40Hz-20kHz
- Earphone Cable Length: 4.6'
| Website | Source | *Rating Value |
| Equipboard | davesolus | 80/100 |
Sennheiser EW IEM G4
Street Price:
Manufacturer:
Product Links:
Cons
- No complaints
Pros
- Very good range
- Suitable for venues prone to interference
Sennheiser is a familiar brand in professional music circles, rightfully so because they continue to receive acclaim for the quality of their products. They enter this list with the Sennheiser EW IEM G4, a versatile In-Ear Monitor system with multiple channel operation and a wide range of frequency selection.
It is designed to work within as many venues and situations as possible, with its wide frequency selection (1,680), up to 61 channels, and up to 42MHz of bandwidth.
You can also adjust RF output power from 10 to 30 to 50 mW for a transmission range of up to 330 feet.
Both the good range and frequency options can be very important if you play shows in places that tend to have a lot of radio interference, casinos are often an example of this with their multiple stages and performance areas.
To simplify setup, it features automatic frequency scan and adaptive diversity. It also has a nifty lock function so you don't accidentally change your settings.
If you play in large venues or ones prone to interference, then this is the wireless system to get.
Features
- Transmitter: SR IEM G4
- Receiver: EK IEM G3
- Earphones: 2 x IE 4
- Frequency Range: Up to 42MHz
- Number of Frequencies: 1680
- Transmitter Input: 2 x XLR/1/4" Combo
- Transmitter Output: 2 x 1/4" (loop out), 1 x RJ-45 (ethernet)
- Receiver Output: 1 x 1/8"
- Receiver Power: 2 x AA Batteries
- Earphone Cable Length: 55"
| Website | Source | *Rating Value |
| YouTube | Chris Mutch-Jones | 98/100 |
Twin Packs
Xvive Audio U4R2
Cons
- Built in battery is not user serviceable
Pros
- Small and light
- Built in rechargeable batteries
- Good battery life - will last for an entire gig without recharging
The Xvive Audio U4R2 shares the same receiver as the standard U4 but comes with 2 receivers.
Like the U4, it operates on the 2.4Ghz frequency, with a range of over 90 feet within line of sight, and a rechargeable battery with up to 5 hours of operation on full charge.
Adding to the U4 with 2 bodybacks, the Xvive U4R2 still reaps all the Pros of the U4 wireless series despite its built-in batteries.
Features
- Transmitter: U4T
- Receiver: 2 x U4R
- Earphones: None
- Frequency Range: 2.4 GHz
- Transmitter Input: 1 x XLR
- Receiver Output: 1 x 1/8"
- Receiver Power: Rechargeable Lithium-ion
| Website | Source | *Rating Value |
| Guitar Interactive | Jonathan Graham | 95/100 |
| YouTube | Aaron Short Music | 96/100 |
Sennheiser EW IEM G4-TWIN
Street Price:
Manufacturer:
Product Links:
Cons
- No complaints
Pros
- Very good range
- Suitable for venues prone to interference
This sports the same features as the single version, only this one has two receivers bundled.
As such you get the same benefits like wide frequency selection (1,680), and multiple channel operation, and make better use of the said features with two receivers already included in the package.
Other features include automatic frequency scan and adaptive diversity which make setting up the twin pack easier.
With Sennheiser's reputation for quality, this is a good value package to get if you're looking for a two receiver In-Ear Monitoring system, particularly in venues prone to radio interference.
Features
- Transmitter: SR IEM G4
- Receiver: 2 x EK IEM G3
- Earphones: 2 x IE 4
- Frequency Range: Up to 42MHz
- Number of Frequencies: 1680
- Transmitter Input: 2 x XLR/1/4" Combo
- Transmitter Output: 2 x 1/4" (loop out), 1 x RJ-45 (ethernet)
- Receiver Output: 1 x 1/8"
- Receiver Power: 2 x AA Batteries
- Earphone Cable Length: 55"
| Website | Source | *Rating Value |
| YouTube | Florin G | 93/100 |
Four Pack
Xvive Audio U4R4
Cons
- Built in battery is not user serviceable
Pros
- Small and light
- Built in rechargeable batteries
- Good battery life - will last for an entire gig without recharging
The Xvive Audio U4R4 is similar to the Xvive U4 but it comes with 4 receivers.
Similar the single unit U4, the operation frequency is 2.4Ghz and a range of 90 feet within line of sight.
The U4R4 has rechargeable batteries with up to 5 hours of operation time.
For the best value in 4-pack wireless IEM sets, the Xvive Audio U4R4 stands alone at the top with its high ratings because of its great value to performance ratio.
Features
- Transmitter: U4T
- Receiver: U4R
- Earphones: None
- Frequency Range: 2.4 GHz
- Number of Frequencies: NA
- Transmitter Input: 1 x XLR
- Transmitter Output: None
- Receiver Output: 1 x 1/8"
- Receiver Power: Rechargeable Lithium-ion
- Earphone Freq Response: NA
- Earphone Cable Length: NA
| Website | Source | *Rating Value |
| Guitar Interactive | Jonathan Graham | 95/100 |
| YouTube | expert island | 97/100 |
Things to Consider When Buying a Wireless In Ear Monitor System
-
FCC regulations that came into effect on July 13, 2020 mean some older wireless systems are longer able to be legally used in the United States. The frequencies that you can no longer use are 617-652 MHz and 663-698 MHz. All of the wireless systems that we have recommended allow you to operate outside those frequencies and are compliant with the regulations. For more information read this FCC consumer guide. The regulations that apply to wireless microphones also apply to wireless in ear monitors.
-
This allows performers to personalize their own monitoring experience, and make necessary adjustments in real-time, while still giving the sound engineer control when needed. The end result of using this feature properly is hearing yourself better, which when set right, can dramatically improve your playing and performance.
-
This specification details the range of frequencies that the wireless system can operate in. With careful planning, you can use this information to maximize the number of IEM systems that you can simultaneously use on stage, by buying those that can work together. Since these systems operate using unlicensed frequency bands, they can be prone to interference, so the more the range of operation, the easier it is to switch to clean frequencies as you move from venue to venue. Note that some of these wireless systems have alternate versions that operate using different frequency bands. While most wireless systems have built-in automatic scan and sync features, there may be times when you'll have to take control and set frequencies yourself. This is particularly true where multiple stages or venues are close to each other as often found in venues like casinos.
-
This specification indicates the frequencies that the earpiece can reproduce. The lower the starting range, the more bass frequencies it can produce, while the top range dictates the high frequencies it can handle. Musicians that need to hear more lows, like bassists and drummers will want to look at those with good low frequency response. Some people even end up replacing the earpiece just to hear the lows better.
-
The earbuds play a very critical role, not only do they play the sound directly to your ear canal, they also have to block out ambient sound and at the same time hold the earpiece assembly in place. Earbuds that are bundled with readily available IEMs are generic, which means that they may or may not perfectly fit your ear, thankfully there are those that offer different sized buds, in case the default one doesn't fit well. To get the most out of your IEM system, you can go for "custom molded" earbuds that are meant to perfectly fit your ear, the caveat is that these personalized ear buds can be expensive.
-
Most IEM receivers are powered by two AA batteries, and since these batteries are widely available, they are the easiest to replace. Still, the cost of having to replace these batteries can add up when the receiver is used on a regular basis. Some manufacturers have opted for built-in rechargeable batteries, which can be cost-effective in the long run. One crucial thing to consider when opting for units with built-in batteries is that some of them will not be readily replaceable. Some units require you to send them to the manufacturer or service center to replace. Doing it yourself will most likely void any warranty the unit has.
The Importance of FCC 2020 Compliance
Multi-Channel Mixing
Frequency Range
Frequency Response
Earbuds
Receiver Battery
Best In Ear Monitors Selection Methodology
The first edition was published in 2016 and the current edition was published on February 8, 2022.
We started off by looking at the best rated FCC compliant in-ear monitors that are widely available in the US. We then gathered and analyzed over 2,600 rating sources, including the most recent reviews, ratings and expert recommendations up to February of 2022. All these data were then fed to the Gearank Algorithm which gave us the rating scores out of 100 that you see above. These scores reflect relative market sentiment about each system, and we used the scores to select the best in ear wireless systems in three different categories: Single Receiver, Twin Packs and Four Packs. For more information about our methods please read How Gearank Works.
About the Author and Contributors
Here are the key people and sources involved in this guide's production - click on linked names for information about their music industry backgrounds.
Lead Author & Researcher
Raphael Pulgar
I've been an audio engineer for 20 years specializing in rock and metal recordings, and also I play guitar and produce original music for my band and other content creators.
Aside from endlessly window shopping and watching hours of gear reviews for leisure, he enjoys playing competitive FPS games, MMORPGs and caring for his 5 cats. He is primarily influenced by guitarists like Kurt Ballou and Paul Gilbert. His favorite pieces of gear are his Ibanez RG550RFR, Orange Brent Hinds Terror amplifier and EQD Acapulco Gold fuzz.
Contributors
Alden Acosta: Product research.
Alexander Briones: Supplemental writing.
Jason Horton: Editing and Illustrating.
Media
Main/Top Image: By Gearank.com using photographs of the Xvive U4. Shure PSM 300 and Sennheiser EW IEM G4.
The individual product images were sourced from websites, promotional materials or supporting documentation provided by their respective manufacturers.
Comments
Thanks for the review
Submitted by Cooper (not verified) on
Thanks for the review everyone - super helpful. Few questions.
It looks like you removed the lower end Galaxy 4-pack system in 2021 but curious what you think of their higher end models?
What are some of the key differentiators between the AS-950-4 band pack and the comparably priced Xvive 4-pack? Thinking stereo optionality with Galaxy line is nice, and although the provided earphones are probably garbage, the package would be helpful for setting up a band with limited funds.
With the Xvive operating at 2.4GHz, does that mean it is not subject to RFI? Or less likely? Not super familiar with the frequency ranges and potential interference issues..
We didn't originally publish
Submitted by Jason Horton on
We didn't originally publish our rating for the AS-950-4 because its preliminary rating fell below our threshold for being added to the shortlist - I've published it now and you can see its rating in this list of 4 pack systems.
I'll let Raphael respond to the other parts of your post.
Hello Cooper,
Submitted by Raphael Pulgar on
Hello Cooper,
Regarding the AS-950-4 vs the Xvive 4-pack, The Galaxy Audio pack has a rackmount receiver while the Xvive has a more compact form factor for both the transmitters and the receivers. This is the main factor people gravitate towards the Xvive and their sentiments are reflected on its higher Gearank Rating.
As for your RFI question, the short answer is yes because devices operating with that chipset do not use FM Modulation like UHF units.
If anything, at this range, Wi-Fi interference is more likely. Fortunately, many wireless audio products operating at this range (mainly the best ones) have been calibrated not to conflict with Wi-Fi routers.
Hope that answers your questions!
-Raphael
Publication of our February
Submitted by Jason Horton on
Publication of our February 2022 Edition resulted in the following system coming off the recommended list above: Shure PSM 900 (P9TRA425CL).
For our March 2020 edition we
Submitted by Jason Horton on
For our March 2020 edition we removed the following 4-Pack systems, however you can still see our analysis of them:
Today we removed the Audio
Submitted by Jason Horton on
Today we removed the Audio-Technica M2 and Audio-Technica M3 due to the FCC compliant versions being discontinued.
The following system has been
Submitted by Jason Horton on
The following system has been removed from the recommended list above due to a lack of availability: Sennheiser EW 300 G3.
I know this is different but:
Submitted by Larry (not verified) on
I know this is different but: Have you looked at any of the systems that work with an iPhone that let you mix your own blend? Examples would be PreSonus Q Mix or the X32 rack by Midas? This is still relatively new tech but wondering if it is worth the look? The idea is that each person is responsible for their own mix and can dial in as much or as little of what they want to hear.
What do you think of LD
Submitted by Gina (not verified) on
What do you think of LD Systems MEI, LD MEI 1000 wireless or, Shure PSM 200 SE 112. We use wireless mics and wedges. Over the last year I started getting ringing in my ears so I'm looking for something that will protect my ears better playing out and that doesn't have any static noise and will give me the sound so I can sound better myself. I can't spend more than $400. Thanks
There aren't a lot of good
Submitted by Jason Horton on
There aren't a lot of good systems in the sub $400 price range, but I'll try to help.
Probably your best option would be the Carvin Audio EM900 which is currently on special for $379 - read our EM900 meta review here.
The LD Systems MEI 1000 hasn't been rated by us so I can't help you with that one, but we did rate the Shure PSM 200 but it's no longer widely available in the USA however here is its rating.
Thank you so much for your
Submitted by Gina (not verified) on
Thank you so much for your advice. I realize $400 isn't much for quality. I may go up to $700. Will the Carvin Audio and the Shure both be for the new rules of 2020?
The current Carvin Audio
Submitted by Jason Horton on
The current Carvin Audio EM900 and all current Shure systems are compliant with the new FCC rules, however I can't guarantee that a second hand Shure PSM 200 system will be.
Make sure any system you buy does not use the frequency bands 617-652 MHz and 663-698 MHz if you want to be able to use them when the new rules come into effect.
I am a non believer in the
Submitted by Kevin Smith (not verified) on
I am a non believer in the need for an in ear monitoring system with bands on the local level. First, I am old school. 61 years old, and have always performed with traditional wedges. I tried ear buds when they firs came out. Ours were ("hardwired"), and came with zero fidelity, and loads of discomfort. Up to , and including a dreadful inner ear infection for all members. Now, after decades of honing my craft, I am playing in a very high profile local act that requires me using the buds again. I have been loaned a set of SURE 846 ear pieces , and a PSM 900 until such time as I can afford my own.
My problem is , while the overall fidelity of the buds have improved over the years , I still find them sorrowfully lacking.
I can't seem to dial in my stage mix when playing live. I am well past the introductory period to become acclimated with the buds as they fit and feel, so suggesting the issue is with our set up introduces another annoying problem as we are using the recommended high end, high cost products.Our history would indicate there is no possible solution as two players have re-invested in their ear buds to the tune of some $6000 each ! The molded custom plugs were bought, used twice, and discarded to the dead gear box and accounts for yet another $1550.
Understand we have won every award for music in our city for the last 5 years. The crowds are enormous. We hire full sound and lights with the same guys running it for every show. In other words, this old man has got a real cushy gig that pays very well, is high profile, and where I don't have to touch a single piece of gear coming or going !
I have to make this ear bud thing work. If anyone has a sure fix ritual we can perform , PLEASE mail me back with a link.
I'm curious, where do you
Submitted by Gina (not verified) on
I'm curious, where do you play?
One system was removed from
Submitted by Jason Horton on
One system was removed from our recommended list as a result of today's update, but you can still read our meta review for the Carvin Audio EM900 Wireless In-Ear Monitor System.
I've been a Shure PSM600 user
Submitted by Peter M. (not verified) on
I've been a Shure PSM600 user for over 15 years, and now I'm forced to move on thanks to FCC regulations. All companies reviewed here, with the exception of Carvin, are offering trade-in rebates for systems operating in the 600mhz range, FYI.
Thanks for the tip - we
Submitted by Jason Horton on
Thanks for the tip - we already have an update planned around this.
For anyone that doesn't know - from July 13, 2020 the FCC will not let you operate wireless systems in most of the 600 MHz band.
More information can be found at fcc.gov/consumers/guides/operation-wireless-microphones.
I am looking for a wireless
Submitted by Maryann (not verified) on
I am looking for a wireless microphone system that includes in ear too.
What I need to buy?
I have also been looking for
Submitted by Jason Horton on
I have also been looking for a single wireless unit that combines both in-ear monitors and a headset mic. Unfortunately I haven't found any yet, or ones with a handheld mic, so at the current time it looks like you have to get them separately which means wearing two bodypacks - not ideal.
I'll post back here if I find a better solution.
Have you heard any pros or
Submitted by Bob (not verified) on
Have you heard any pros or cons on the Galaxy Audio TX and RX system? The price is certainly attractive and the specs are good. Thanks for any input.
Galaxy Audio is often
Submitted by Chris (not verified) on
Galaxy Audio is often overlooked but an great company with quality audio and customer service second to none. I love that they field their service calls at their home base in central Kansas USA! Shoot just call them if you have any IEM questions they are helpful and not at all pushy.
I'm curious about this, you
Submitted by Scott (not verified) on
I'm curious about this, you give Galaxy a very positive review here but don't put them in your list, why's that? You really didn't answer the original question. Thanks.
Hi Scott,
Submitted by Jason Horton on
Hi Scott,
You seem to be addressing "Chris (not verified)" as though he works here at Gearank.com - he doesn't work here but I do.
Just for the record, to date we have not published reviews of any Galaxy Audio wireless IEM systems on this site.
To answer the original question, I'm not aware of Galaxy Audio having any wireless IEM's with the designation "TX" or "RX". To the best of my knowledge their wireless IEMs come with the designation "AS".
Only one of their wireless IEMs had high enough ratings to make it onto our short-list for this guide and it didn't rate highly enough for us to recommend it - it was the AS-1100.
Why is the MIPRO stuff not on
Submitted by Damien (not verified) on
Why is the MIPRO stuff not on this list?
my thoughts exactly. the only
Submitted by Ropodope (not verified) on
my thoughts exactly. the only 100% pure digital IEM system on the market and fantastic in its' design and delivery. everything about it reaks of quality and not only does it outperform the Sennheiser g3 or new g4 IEM (which are great in their own right) it can be had at almost 1/2 the cost. there is NOTHING out there like it. Here's a fantastically detailed review by a real musician. he is right on every point. http://northmar.com/mipro-mi-909-review-best-in-ear-wireless-for-musicians/
We examined the top seller
Submitted by Jason Horton on
We examined the Wireless IEM lists of all the major music gear retailers in the USA and the Mipro brand wasn't on any of those lists. Mipro did win a TEC award a couple of years ago for one of their wireless IEM systems but they didn't qualify for this guide because they're not widely available.
I use the Mipro 909 system
Submitted by Darron (not verified) on
I use the Mipro 909 system personally, and have the Sennheiser systems at work. I prefer the Mipro, hands down. I agree, not as commonly available, but with the internet, that’s not a problem these days. It’s not hard to find a vender willing to sell you one if you look.
Did you see anything about UE
Submitted by Sexton (not verified) on
Did you see anything about UE Pro?
I don't recall seeing
Submitted by Jason Horton on
I don't recall seeing anything specific about Ultimate Ears Pro, and I'm not sure what Alexander Briones saw during our research, but I can tell you they didn't make it onto our short-list.
Edifying and helpful article
Submitted by Michael P. Naughton (not verified) on
Edifying and helpful article Alexander Briones and Gearank, thanks. I am sold on IEMS as a vocalist after experiencing horrible sound and technical difficulties at well-known venues. Floor monitors are a thing of the past and a crapshoot for most singers. I have also spoken with other pros and this is the way to go.
I got my eye/ears on Sennheiser EW 300 based on your article.
Glad to be of help, hope you
Submitted by Alexander Briones on
Glad to be of help, hope you get the most out of the Sennheiser EW 300.