The Best Wireless Microphone System Guide - Handheld
Originally published on Jan. 18, 2016 and last updated on Mar 29, 2018.
Microphone Guides
We have a range:of helpful mic guides for you:
All the wireless systems we recommend are compliant with the FCC regulations that come into effect in July 2020.
More and more professionals are switching to wireless systems, proving that they are even more reliable and viable for gigs and events. Today's wireless systems are relatively free from interference and drop outs, so if the fear of these things happening has been holding you back then there's no longer any need to worry - just ensure you get a system with the range you need.
Here we present you with the best wireless microphone systems, updated for 2018, to help free you up as you sing or speak on stage.
Contents
- The Best Wireless Microphone Systems
- Things To Consider When Buying a Handheld Wireless Microphone System
- Methodology
- Comments
The Best Wireless Microphone Systems
| Gearank | Sources | Street Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Mic System | |||
| GTD Audio G-380H | 87 | 325+ | $129 |
| 2 Mic Systems | |||
| GTD Audio G-622H | 88 | 750+ | $168 |
| Shure BLX288/PG58 | 88 | 225+ | $549 |
| Single Mic Systems | |||
| Shure BLX24R/SM58 | 92 | 70+ | $399 |
| Sennheiser XSW2-835 | 90 | 10+ | $400 |
| Shure SLX24/SM58 | 94 | 70+ | $599 |
| Sennheiser EW 135 G3 | 92 | 200+ | $600 |
| Sennheiser EW 165 G3 | 90 | 30+ | $750 |
Best Wireless Microphone System With 4 Mics
GTD Audio G-380H
The GTD Audio G-380H is a popular system due to its very low price. The price is kept down in 2 main ways - the system is not expandable and will cause interference if you try using 2 systems at the same time, and the microphones are only basic ones.
The volume of each of the 4 mics can be set independently at the receiver and a mixed signal taken out, or you can simply take all 4 balanced XLR lines out independently to your mixing console.
Although the majority of user reviews are quite favorable, some do mention quality control issues and a few report that one or more of their mics stopped working in less than a year.
Most of the reports about range were positive with only a few users reporting interference or noise issues.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 45Hz to 18KHz
- Receiver frequency: 240 - 260 MHz
- Range: 350 feet
- Individual Balanced XLR and a mixed non-balanced 1/4" output
- Battery Life: 9 Hours
Overall this is an okay system given the low price, however you must handle with care and don't expect the same year in and year out robust performance you would expect from a more expensive system.
Best Wireless Microphone Systems With 2 Mics
GTD Audio G-622H
GTD Audio gets good ratings, not because they're the highest quality, but because they offer the good value for money and those who are budget conscious rate this double mic package very highly.
One of the most common positive comments about the GTD Audio 622H system is that the mics, although enclosed in solid plastic rather than metal, have a good weight and feel to them.
The most commonly reported negative is that the second mic has problems with dropouts after a while, although the manufacturer will replace them under warranty.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 45Hz to 18kHz
- Receiver frequency: UHF 550MHz - 580MHz
- Range: Up to 450 feet / 150 meters
- Two XLR individual outputs and one 1/4" TRS Mixed output
- 100 selectable frequencies on each channel
- Individual volume control on each channel
- Rack mountable in a standard 19" rack
Most users are satisfied with the overall quality and performance of the GT Audio G-622H, especially when considering the price. Mobile DJs and event singers were happy with the sound quality as were those using it in fixed installations such as houses of worship.
This is very much an entry-level system, and some report moving up to more expensive options after using it for some time, still it's hard to beat the extremely low price.
Shure BLX288/PG58
Shure have combined their budget dual BLX receiver with their budget PG58 microphone to produce an affordable 2 mic system.
The Shure PG58 mic capsule is a step down from the SM58 in terms of ruggedness, while many people on forums debate whether or not the sound quality is nearly as good as an SM58. The debate is open, but the majority opinion is that the PG58 sounds good, just not quite as good as the SM58.
Most of the positive reviews centered around the quality of the mic when compared to other cheaper dual systems as well as the battery life of the transmitters. Its biggest asset is really the SM58 capsule, which many still deem to be the industry standard when it comes to miking vocals.
There were few consistent negatives reported, only that a few buyers found a difference in EQ and sonic tone between the 2 mics, and some complained that it doesn't have a mute button.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 60Hz to 15kHz
- Receiver frequency - can be bought in the following UHF bands:
- H8: 518MHz to 542MHz
- H9: 512MHz to 542MHz
- J10: 584MHz to 608MHz
- Range: Up to 300 feet
- Balanced XLR and non-balanced 1/4" output
- 12 channels.
This is the cheapest way to get two Shure wireless mics.
Best Wireless Microphone Systems With 1 Mic
Shure BLX24R/SM58
This provides you with the same SM58 microphone capsule as the higher priced SLX system, but comes in at a lower price because it's using the BLX range of receivers which only provide 96 selectable frequencies and can only be used with a maximum of 12 compatible systems simultaneously.
If you are mainly going to be using your wireless mics in a typical band setting then this is the better Shure option to go for because you won't need to expand beyond 12 mics.
There were very few negative comments from reviewers with the only issue coming up several times was that it only has an on/off switch with no mute button.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 50Hz to 15kHz
- Receiver frequency - can be bought in the following UHF bands:
- H8: 518MHz to 542MHz
- H9: 512MHz to 542MHz
- H10: 542MHz to 572MHz
- J10: 584MHz to 608MHz
- Range: Up to 300 feet
- Balanced XLR and non-balanced 1/4" output
- 12 channels.
- Rack mountable 1U (half-rack)
This is the lowest priced rack mountable wireless system currently with a Shure SM58 mic capsule - the BLX24/SM58 is the same other than the fact it's not rack mountable, making it $50 cheaper - check availability at Amazon.com.
Sennheiser XSW2-835
This system uses the Sennheiser e835 dynamic microphone capsule which has good ratings as a live vocal mic and competes in the same class as the Shure SM58.
It features 12 channels which can be selected automatically or manually and you can use multiple units on stage at the same time.
One handy feature is that the on/off switch is positioned at the bottom of the mic so signers don't end up turning it off accidentally during performance.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 50Hz to 16kHz
- Receiver frequency: 548MHz to 572MHz
- Range: Up to 250 feet
- Balanced XLR and non-balanced 1/4" output
- 12 Channels: Both manual and automatic selection available
- Table Top form factor
This wireless system is a good alternative to the Shure BLX24R/SM58 for those of you who prefer the Sennheiser e835 over the SM58.
Shure SLX24/SM58
This features the same capsule as the famous Shure SM58 which is the most popular wired vocal dynamic mic in use today.
Owners who reviewed it were very positive about both the sound quality and the ease of use - particularly the automatic syncing function.
I was unable to find any consistent complaints about the SLX24/SM58.
The SLX receiver is Shure's mid-range analog receiver which has 960 selectable frequencies and can work with up to 20 compatible wireless microphones.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 50Hz to 15kHz
- Receiver frequency - can be bought in the following UHF bands:
- G4: 470MHz to 494MHz
- G5: 494MHz to 518MHz
- H5: 518MHz to 542MHz
- H19: 542MHz to 572MHz
- J3: 572MHz to 596MHz
- Range: Up to 300 feet
- Balanced XLR and non-balanced 1/4" output
- 12 channels available in all areas with up to 20 channels in regions that allow it.
- Rack mountable 1U (half-rack)
If you want a Shure SM58 system and you won't need to expand beyond using 12 of them, then go for the cheaper Shure BLX24R/SM58 above.
Sennheiser EW 135 G3
The Sennheiser EW 135 G3 system is similar to the more expensive Sennheiser EW 165 G3 system except that if has the e835 dynamic mic capsule instead of a condenser mic.
User report that the syncing function works very well making setting up and integrating into your sound system very easy. Many users report using 4 or more of these mics in their setup with no interference issues.
There were no consistently reported negatives other than a couple of people who lamented the lack of a mute button on the mic.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 80Hz-18kHz
- Receiver frequency: UHF 516MHz - 558MHz
- Range: Not Specified
- One XLR output and one 1/4" unbalanced output
- Transmitter Battery: 2 x AA (Up to 8 Hours) or Sennheiser BA 2015 Accupack
- Infra Red sync function with Up to 8 Systems running per channel
- Rack mountable via optional mounting kit
If you like Sennheiser dynamic mics and you want a wireless system that can grow as your needs do then this is the one for you.
Sennheiser EW 165 G3
The Sennheiser EW 165 G3's distinction is its use of a condenser mic capsule, which allows for a wider frequency response than conventional dynamic microphones. This wider frequency response allows for more sonic nuances and improved clarity, which many vocalists prefer.
Combining this highly sensitive mic with a reliable wireless system makes for a great mic that captured the hearts of many of its users. It features a fully programmable receiver, with twenty frequency banks and 12 preset frequencies each, allowing for quick setups. There's also a special sound check mode that lets you check the RF signal and audio discretely.
Feature Overview
- Mic frequency response: 80Hz-18kHz
- Receiver frequency: UHF 516MHz - 558MHz
- Range: Not Specified
- One XLR output and one 1/4" TRS Mixed output
- Transmitter Battery: 2 x AA (Up to 8 Hours) or Sennheiser BA 2015 Accupack
- IR sync function with Up to 8 Systems running per channel
- Rack mountable via optional mounting kit
Many were very happy with the Sennheiser EW 165 G3's overall performance, but most of the praises came from singers and vocalists who felt that they sounded and performed better with this mic. Ease of use and reliability were also pointed out along with its solid construction. There was one person who had some bones to pick with the included mic clip being too tight, but most are impressed with its overall performance. If you're looking for a high quality wireless condenser microphone then the Sennheiser EW 165 G3 is a worthy investment.
Things To Consider When Buying a Handheld Wireless Microphone System
-
The Importance of FCC 2020 Compliance As of July 13, 2020 new regulations from the FCC will come into effect and as a result some older wireless systems will no longer be able to be legally used in the United States. The frequencies that you will no longer be allowed to use from that date forward are 617-652 MHz and 663-698 MHz. All of the wireless microphone systems that we have recommended allow you to operate outside those frequencies and are compliant with the new regulations. For more information read this FCC consumer guide.
-
Number of Channels. This determines the maximum number of compatible systems you can use at the same time. For example if you need to use 20 wireless mics then you'd need 20 channels so you can run 20 systems simultaneously.
-
Range. The ranges presented above are for line of sight where you can see the receiver from where you are using the mic. If you are going to have obstacles, such as walking around a crowd of people as you might in a theater restaurant or house of worship, then it's best to get one with at least twice the range as the actual distance to the receiver. For the kinds of gigs most bands play you won't really need to go beyond 150 feet.
-
Receiver Frequency. If you, or someone else nearby, are using other wireless systems for mics or instruments, then be sure to check which frequencies they use and get a new wireless mic system that runs on a different frequency range. You can find the frequency in your manual or printed on the back of your receiver.
-
Analog vs Digital. Theoretically digital systems should provide slightly less noise at long range and slightly better dynamic and frequency response. The reality is that for most music and worship applications the analog systems are rated higher than their more expensive digital cousins - as a result the top ranked systems above are all analog. There is one significant functional difference - if you need to encrypt the signal then you have to go digital, but that's not a concern for most common uses.
Best Wireless Microphone Selection Methodology
For this 2018 update, we stuck with the game plan by limiting the list to just the popular and top rated wireless microphone systems that are available. Like the previous iterations, we limited the scope to systems with handheld mics. We ended up gathering around over 4100 reviews and ratings, which we then processed via the Gearank algorithm. For more information about our methods see How Gearank Works.
Handheld Wireless Microphone Summary
Like with most things in life, you get what you pay for. The cheaper systems tend to have lower spec'd mic capsules, while the more expensive ones tend to have mics that are well respected in sound reinforcement circles.
If you have any questions or comments please post them below.
Comments
Hi, I would like to buy a
Submitted by Karen (not verified) on
Hi, I would like to buy a system for primary school performances where as many children as possible can wear lavalier microphones and their voices are broadcast to the audience. Any help much appreciated.
We would need more
Submitted by Jason Horton on
We would need more information before we can offer any advice.
What is the main use the system will be for - plays, musical theater, choir?
How many children do you want to mic?
Do you already have a PA System, and if so, how many input channels does it have for microphones?
Hi, what's the best option of
Submitted by Marcelo (not verified) on
Hi, what's the best option for wireless microphones, headset type, for live singing? Thanks.
We haven't yet analysed those
Submitted by Jason Horton on
We haven't yet analysed those in detail yet but we have processed some for their Gearank scores so this might help: Wireless Headset Microphones
Hi!
Submitted by Dan (not verified) on
Hi!
My question is similar to Karen's. I run a Drama Club and I have approximately $556 to spend on wireless microphones. My District recommends Shure and they are great. I already run 4 Audio Technica sets (3 lavolier and 1 handheld) systems... I believe the lavolier are ATW-310s? Don't quote me on that. Anyways, I want to get the best bang for my buck and put as many as I can on stage without feedback destroying my speakers. The most important thing is range and mic sensitivity. We don't sing into it really so that's not that important.
The space is a typical elementary school gym. The stage is built adjacent to the gym but it sucks up sound due to carpeting and a thick curtain and sound absorbing retractable door panels. The speakers are ceiling mounted (I know, not ideal for theater). The system itself is rack-mounted behind a brick wall in a closet approximately...30-50 feet from the stage. I've had no problem with mic drop out as long as the mics are rack mounted. Those plugged into my xlr floor jacks on the other hand...
Thoughts?
Do you have a "Best Wireless
Submitted by Phillip (not verified) on
Do you have a "Best Wireless Microphone System Guide - Body Pack"?
We haven't done a guide on
Submitted by Jason Horton on
We haven't done a guide on wireless headset systems with bodypack transmitters yet, but it is on the list of topics we're considering.
Hi, I have a Shure Lavalier
Submitted by James (not verified) on
Hi, I have a Shure Lavalier BLX4 receiver and BLX1 body pack. I need a better Wireless handheld for toasts and such, but also more than 1 for karaoke. Is the PG58 double good enough, or should I get the 24SM58 single? If I get the single, can I pair another one later? Can I put any to my lavalier receiver and avoid getting either? Essentially, I'm willing to pay a little more to eventually have the fewest receivers and best mic's (in this range) over time. Does that all make sense? Please advise.
The PG58 receiver will be
Submitted by Jason Horton on
The PG58 receiver will be fine for handling both singing and speeches.
If you go with a single receiver then you can add an extra one later but that will cost more in the long run, my preference would be to go the other way.
I want to upgrade my current
Submitted by Jake (not verified) on
I want to upgrade my current array of 12 wireless microphones to 24. I have a sound board that supports that many channels. Do I need any other equipment to make sure there is no interference other than making sure my frequencies don't overlap?
I've never run that many
Submitted by Jason Horton on
I've never run that many wireless mics at the same time, but the principal should still be the same - if they're on different frequencies then you shouldn't have a problem.
Looking for a REALLY basic
Submitted by FredT (not verified) on
Looking for a REALLY basic plug & play system. To be used on an athletic field, receiver in a building 100' from mic. Ideally receiver has jacks for external antenna, (Metal building) and a SIMPLE single channel mic. (The last unit always had issues syncing mic and receiver.) Many different high school kids and parents using, so idiot proof simplicity is essential.
I can't suggest anything that
Submitted by Jason Horton on
I can't suggest anything that is completely 'idiot proof' because if the receiver's not protected from passers-by they can turn it off or change settings while it's in use, and if you forget to replace the mic's batteries as needed then you'll also have problems.
With those caveats in mind, I believe you would be best served by the Shure BLX24R/SM58. It's relatively easy to use, rack-mountable and the receiver has BNC connectors for both antennas. Avoid the cheaper non rack-mountable BLX24 receiver because it doesn't have the antenna connector you need.
BTW - Although I could be wrong, I don't think there are any good single channel systems with BNC antenna connectors.
Looking to do Karoke in a
Submitted by Gary (not verified) on
Looking to do Karoke in a catering space with a dance floor that is about 20x20. Already have Samson live!615 speakers.
Would either of these wireless mics be ok?
Stage v466 - Quad Vocal Wireless System - B Band or Samson Stage 200.
thanks,
Gary
Neither of those two systems
Submitted by Jason Horton on
Neither of those two systems made our short-list when we did the original research for this guide so we haven't kept any data on them. The systems listed above are the ones that we currently recommend.
Which is the best Wireless
Submitted by Jerry Ken (not verified) on
Which is the best Wireless microphone you would recommend for a lead vocalist in a live band that plays both in and outdoors?
All of the systems featured
Submitted by Jason Horton on
All of the systems featured above will work just fine for your purposes - if you go for the GTD Audio 622H then you'll have a spare mic should you ever need it.
The wireless microphone for
Submitted by Hue Nguyen (not verified) on
The wireless microphone for the [PRODUCT NAME REDACTED] is posted on Amazon. Could you please let know what this system's Gearank score is for your list?
Sincerely,
Hue Nguyen
Sorry but I had to edit your
Submitted by Jason Horton on
Sorry but I had to edit your post and remove the product name because we've had problems with advertising spam lately and we don't want to encourage it.
To answer your question, that wireless mic system didn't rate highly enough to make our short list (many of its most favorable reviews are suspicious and possibly fake) so we haven't published a Gearank score for it.
Looking to buy an affordable
Submitted by Dave Prasad (not verified) on
Looking to buy an affordable 4 channel wireless microphone system, to be used mainly for singing and preaching. Which one would you recommend?
The one we recommend is the
Submitted by Jason Horton on
The one we recommend is the GTD Audio G-787H but I can see that they're out of stock a the moment.
There is a cheaper one from the same manufacturer, and although it's not on our recommended list, it may suit your needs: GTD Audio G-380H.
The new FCC rulings no longer
Submitted by D. Ha (not verified) on
The new FCC rulings no longer allow the use of 600MHz range for wireless microphones. Would you update your recommendations?
The new FCC rules don't come
Submitted by Jason Horton on
The new FCC rules don't come into effect until July 13, 2020 - you can read more about that at fcc.gov/consumers/guides/operation-wireless-microphones.
To answer your question, yes we are working on an update to our recommendations, but I don't have a publication date I can announce yet.
This guide has now been
Submitted by Jason Horton on
This guide has now been updated to reflect the FCC regulations that come into effect in 2020.
hi. i am vietnamese, i am a
Submitted by hien nguyen (not verified) on
Hi. I am Vietnamese, I am a teacher so I would like to find a device that supports my teaching job which can use wifi, USB, MEMORY STICK, AND THE FIRST IMPORTANT IT MUST BE SMALL AND LIGHT, IT MADE IN jAPAN OR AMERICAN
This application is too far
Submitted by Jason Horton on
This application is too far outside the use cases that we know about and research here at Gearank.com. Maybe one of our other readers will have advice for you, but most people using this guide do so for stage related purposes or something rather similar to that.
Today we removed the
Submitted by Jason Horton on
Today we removed the following system from our recommended list because the only remaining version available from the manufacturer is not compliant with the new FCC regulations: GTD Audio 622H.
The updated version, G-622H,
Submitted by Jason Horton on
The updated version, G-622H, is now FCC compliant and has been reincluded in our recommended list as part of our March 2018 update.
As a result of our March 2018
Submitted by Jason Horton on
As a result of our March 2018 update the following systems came off our recommended list:
Post a Comment or Question